Fox News to Swing Left?
controversial issues. This is something that doesn't work. I've been doing this jazz since 1977 and I can tell you it doesn't work.
Who will decide what is controversial? Will PBS be forced to broadcast Rush Limbaugh for balance? Will Pat Robinson have to put on a Buddhist for balance? What is controversial?
My guess is that under the “Fairness Doctrine”... if Conservative folks are in power, the media will be forced to lean Conservative...and if the Liberals are in power, the media will have to lean Liberal. ...or risk losing a broadcast license.
It's a no-brainier that most talk radio RIGHT NOW is conservative. This is because the radio stations go where the ratings are, and right now that means conservative viewpoint. I believe this is because so much on Television (other than Fox News) is left of center. Conservative talk radio is popular because so many conservatives have been chased away from the big three TV networks.
People choose radio stations the same way they choose their lunch or the clothes they wear. It is part of their identity. If you force a radio station to lose its identity, you force it to give up the appeal it has to its audience. Making a talk radio station like KOLE air someone like Al Frankin is like telling a station like KAYD it has to play music from Lil’ Wayne & Fat Joe.
Let the conservatives have their Fox News and let the liberals have their CNN.
In my opinion, if the government goes ahead and pushes the Fairness Doctrine, it will mean less listeners to LOCAL radio and more folks moving to Satellite radio where the government keeps it's nose out of content control.
Here is the latest news release from Cornyn's office on the matter, he opposes it...Others favor it..On this issue, I have to side with Cornyn.
Cornyn Joins in Introducing Bill to Ensure Free, Open Media
New Legislation Would Prevent Imposition of So-Called “Fairness Doctrine”
WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, joined several Senate colleagues Friday in introducing legislation to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using funds to impose the so-called “Fairness Doctrine” on America’s broadcasters. Sen. Cornyn is an original cosponsor of the Broadcasters Freedom Act of 2007, S. 1748. The bill’s main sponsor is U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn.
“A basic principle of our democracy is a press that is free of government influence or control. It is shameful that some now believe the federal government should dictate to Texans what they can say and when on the airwaves,” U.S. Sen. Cornyn said. “If reinstated, the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ would be a direct assault on one of this nation’s most cherished freedoms. This important legislation will ensure that all ideas can be expressed openly and freely on our nation’s airwaves.”
In recent days, Democrat leaders in both the U.S. House and U.S. Senate have expressed support for reinstating the “Fairness Doctrine,” which was repealed some 20 years ago. This was an obsolete federal regulation that, until its repeal in 1987, required broadcasters to air all sides of controversial issues, regardless of listener choice, or risk the loss of their broadcast license.
Sen. Cornyn serves on the Armed Services, Judiciary and Budget Committees. In addition, he is Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Ethics. He serves as the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee’s Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship subcommittee and the Armed Services Committee’s Airland subcommittee.